Reversing logical nihilism

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract Gillian Russell has recently proposed counterexamples to such elementary argument forms as Conjunction Introduction (e.g. ‘Snow is white. Grass green. Therefore, snow white and grass green’) Identity white’). These purported involve expressions that are sensitive linguistic context—for example, a sentence which true when it appears alone but false embedded in larger sentence. If they genuine counterexamples, looks though logical nihilism—the view there no valid forms—might be true. In this paper, I argue the not genuine, on grounds equivocate. Having defused threat of nihilism, kind context sensitivity at work Russell’s if taken seriously, far from leading reveals new, previously undreamt-of forms. By way proof concept present simple logic, Solo-Only Propositional Logic (SOPL), designed capture some them. Along way, interesting subtleties about fallacy equivocation revealed.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Logical Nihilism in Contemporary French Philosophy

Recanati takes for granted the conveyance conception of linguistic communication, although it is not very clear exactly where he lies on the spectrum of possible variations. Even if we disavow all such conceptions of linguistic communication, there will be a place for semantic theory in articulating normative concepts such as logical consistency and logical validity. An approach to semantics fo...

متن کامل

Madhyamaka is Not Nihilism

Introduction Nāgārjuna (c. 200 CE) is the founder of the Madhyamaka school of Buddhist philosophy, and easily, after the Buddha himself, the most influential philosopher in the Mahāyāna Buddhist tradition. Despite the great consensus on his philosophical and doctrinal importance, there is little consensus, either in the canonical Buddhist and non-Buddhist literature of India, Tibet and East Asi...

متن کامل

Nihilism, Relativism, and Literary Theory

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...

متن کامل

Against mereological nihilism

I argue that mereological nihilism fails because it cannot answer (what I describe as) the special arrangement question: when is it true that the xs (the mereological simples) are arranged F-wise? I suggest that the answers given in the literature fail and that the obvious responses that could be made look to undermine the motivations for adopting nihilism in the first place.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Synthese

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['0039-7857', '1573-0964']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03471-x